The Jurisprudence Of Product Liability In Nigeria: A Need To Complement The Existing Fault Theory

Main Article Content

Gbade Akinrinmade

Abstract

This article argues for the adoption of strict liability principle as an additional
theoretical basis of liability, to complement the existing fault theory on product
liability claims in Nigeria. The fault theory, which currently is the only
theoretical basis of liability, unduly burdens claimants. The reason for this is
that such claimants are expected to establish fault despite the lack of insight
into the complex processes of production. While establishing fault in cases of
manufacturing defect may seem less onerous, it is an uphill task when it
concerns design or warning defects. Bearing in mind that a principal rationale
of tort law is to ensure that prejudiced parties are compensated for losses
suffered, this article explains why it is necessary to assess and review applicable
principle of liability in Nigeria to ensure that it is in line with the demands of
justice, which should be in conformity with the peculiar circumstances of its
operating environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Akinrinmade, G. (2025). The Jurisprudence Of Product Liability In Nigeria: A Need To Complement The Existing Fault Theory. Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 7(2), 188-210. https://jsdlp.ogeesinstitute.edu.ng/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/368
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Akinrinmade, G. (2025). The Jurisprudence Of Product Liability In Nigeria: A Need To Complement The Existing Fault Theory. Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 7(2), 188-210. https://jsdlp.ogeesinstitute.edu.ng/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/368

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.