Separating The Wheat From The Chaff: Delimiting Public Policy Influence On The Arbitrability Of Disputes In Africa

Abstract

This article focuses on the arbitrability of disputes. It examines the recent
global trend of delimiting the role of public policy in determining matters
that should be subject to arbitration. The evaluation shows that the application
of doctrines of separability and kompetenz-kompentenz plays a vital role in
the delimitation process. However, notwithstanding the global trend to restrict
the role of public policy in determining arbitrability, some countries in Africa
still widely interpret public policy to revoke arbitral clause, stay arbitral
proceedings, or refuse enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. They justify
this approach on the basis that public policy is a means to protect national
economic interest against foreign manipulation or exploitation. Anchored on
Morgan’s theoretical approach, this article criticizes the excessive role of
public policy in determining the arbitrability of disputes in Africa. It calls for
a change to reflect the global trend through judicial activism and legislative
reform. Although protecting national economic interest is an important goal,
restricting matters that are arbitrable will not promote foreign investment.
Therefore, countries in Africa must fashion arbitration practices that reflect
their socio-economic background as well as contemporary arbitral trends
around the world.